New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Tiptap.dev

Tiptap.dev

Recommended by ChatGPT across 31 prompt topics people ask about
24
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
31
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
6.4K
Est. value / mo
$17
Avg rank
9.03
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Tiptap.dev

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best React rich text editor? rank 2 10 /mo What's the best React text editor? rank 4 3 /mo Which Angular editor is best? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best Angular rich text editor? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best drag and drop HTML editor? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best drag and drop HTML5 editor? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best free rich text editor? rank 6 0 /mo What's the best free online visual HTML editor? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best graphical HTML editor? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best HTML rich text editor? rank 8 0 /mo Which HTML5 rich text editor is best? rank 6 0 /mo Which HTML5 visual editor is best? rank 7 0 /mo What's the best markup editor? rank 5 0 /mo What's the best online rich text editor? rank 6 0 /mo What's the best open source markdown editor? rank 14 0 /mo What is the best open source HTML editor? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best open source HTML editor for Windows? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best open source HTML5 editor? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best open source web editor? rank 5 0 /mo Which open source website editor is best? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best React editor? rank 7 0 /mo What's the best React text editor component? rank 3 0 /mo What's the best React markdown editor? rank 16 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best React rich text editor?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. lexical.dev
    2. draftjs.org
    3. slatejs.org
    4. tiptap.dev ← this site
    5. quilljs.com
    6. ckeditor.com
    7. tiny.cloud
    8. prosemirror.net

    Where Tiptap.dev ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #6
    most common spot
    6%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    1
    #3
    1
    #4
    2
    #5
    3
    #6
    5
    #7
    2
    #8
    3
    #9
    3
    #10
    1
    #11
    2
    #12
    0
    #13
    1
    #14
    2
    #15
    1
    #16
    2
    #17
    1
    #18
    0
    #19
    0
    #20
    1

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Tiptap.dev, ranked by how many topics they share.

    quilljs.com
    29 shared
    ckeditor.com
    29 shared
    tiny.cloud
    28 shared
    froala.com
    26 shared
    github.com
    25 shared
    summernote.org
    24 shared
    tinymce.com
    20 shared
    prosemirror.net
    16 shared
    trumbowyg.com
    14 shared
    editorjs.io
    14 shared
    jodit.com
    14 shared
    npmjs.com
    12 shared
    nicedit.com
    12 shared
    stackblitz.com
    11 shared
    stackoverflow.com
    10 shared
    lexical.dev
    10 shared
    draftjs.org
    10 shared
    slatejs.org
    10 shared
    codemirror.net
    9 shared
    suneditor.com
    9 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →