New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Tinymce.com

Tinymce.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 61 prompt topics people ask about
16
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
61
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
33K
Est. value / mo
$7
Avg rank
12.38
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Tinymce.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best free HTML editing software? rank 8 1 /mo What's the best visual HTML editor? rank 6 1 /mo What's the best web HTML editor? rank 20 1 /mo What's the best Angular rich text editor? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best Bootstrap editor? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best CMS for Angular? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best content authoring tool? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best drag and drop HTML editor? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best drag and drop HTML5 editor? rank 2 0 /mo What's the best free HTML code editor? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best free HTML editor software? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best free HTML text editor? rank 7 0 /mo What's the best free HTML5 editor? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best free PHP text editor? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best free rich text editor? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best free text editor for web development? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best free online visual HTML editor? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best freeware web editor? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best HTML authoring tool? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best HTML editing software? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best HTML editor program? rank 9 0 /mo What is the best HTML editor software? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best HTML rich text editor? rank 6 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best HTML editor?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. w3schools.com
    2. mozilla.org
    3. developer.mozilla.org
    4. quackit.com
    5. geeksforgeeks.org
    6. tutorialspoint.com
    7. stackoverflow.com
    8. codepen.io

    Where Tinymce.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #9
    most common spot
    2%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    1
    #3
    0
    #4
    0
    #5
    3
    #6
    4
    #7
    2
    #8
    3
    #9
    8
    #10
    4
    #11
    4
    #12
    2
    #13
    3
    #14
    4
    #15
    3
    #16
    4
    #17
    7
    #18
    2
    #19
    3
    #20
    4

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Tinymce.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    ckeditor.com
    61 shared
    github.com
    45 shared
    tiny.cloud
    43 shared
    quilljs.com
    40 shared
    summernote.org
    37 shared
    froala.com
    37 shared
    w3schools.com
    32 shared
    codepen.io
    27 shared
    jsfiddle.net
    23 shared
    stackblitz.com
    21 shared
    tiptap.dev
    20 shared
    stackoverflow.com
    19 shared
    trumbowyg.com
    19 shared
    brackets.io
    18 shared
    notepad-plus-plus.org
    17 shared
    nicedit.com
    16 shared
    jodit.com
    16 shared
    codemirror.net
    16 shared
    sublimetext.com
    16 shared
    atom.io
    15 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →