New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Usac.org

Usac.org

Recommended by ChatGPT across 56 prompt topics people ask about
104
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
56
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
57K
Est. value / mo
$109
Avg rank
8.73
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Usac.org

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best lifeline phone? rank 1 17 /mo What's the best free government phone and tablet with unlimited data? rank 1 7 /mo What's the best plan for broadband? rank 6 7 /mo What's the best internet service for rural areas? rank 2 4 /mo What's the best free phone for low income? rank 3 3 /mo What's the best free phone service for low income? rank 4 2 /mo What's the best free broadband? rank 3 1 /mo What's the best free government phone program? rank 6 1 /mo What's the best free government smartphone? rank 7 1 /mo What's the best Lifeline cell phone service? rank 3 1 /mo What are the best lifeline phone companies? rank 1 1 /mo What's the best lifeline phone service providers? rank 3 1 /mo What's the best lifeline service provider? rank 5 1 /mo What's the best low income internet? rank 9 1 /mo What's the best ACP plan? rank 5 0 /mo What are the best ACP program providers? rank 5 0 /mo What's the best ACP provider? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best ACP wireless provider? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best free cell phone service? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best free government phone and tablet combo? rank 7 0 /mo What are the best free government phone companies? rank 7 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best free government phone?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. usac.org ← this site
    2. lifelinesupport.org
    3. fcc.gov
    4. govinfo.gov
    5. usa.gov
    6. consumer.gov
    7. benefits.gov
    8. mybenefits.gov

    Where Usac.org ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #7
    most common spot
    18%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    5
    #2
    1
    #3
    4
    #4
    3
    #5
    3
    #6
    3
    #7
    9
    #8
    3
    #9
    5
    #10
    2
    #11
    1
    #12
    2
    #13
    3
    #14
    1
    #15
    2
    #16
    5
    #17
    1
    #18
    0
    #19
    2
    #20
    1

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Usac.org, ranked by how many topics they share.

    fcc.gov
    55 shared
    verizon.com
    45 shared
    att.com
    44 shared
    assurancewireless.com
    38 shared
    lifelinesupport.org
    36 shared
    safelinkwireless.com
    36 shared
    qlinkwireless.com
    36 shared
    standupwireless.com
    31 shared
    t-mobile.com
    29 shared
    airtalkwireless.com
    27 shared
    cricketwireless.com
    22 shared
    usa.gov
    22 shared
    getinternet.gov
    21 shared
    truconnect.com
    20 shared
    boostmobile.com
    20 shared
    accesswireless.com
    16 shared
    consumer.ftc.gov
    15 shared
    tagmobile.com
    15 shared
    benefits.gov
    14 shared
    frontier.com
    12 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →