New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Ultraedit.com

Ultraedit.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 129 prompt topics people ask about
9
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
129
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
35K
Est. value / mo
$7
Avg rank
13.72
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Ultraedit.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best text editor for Mac? rank 7 3 /mo What's the best Windows text editor? rank 10 1 /mo What are the best Windows text editors? rank 8 1 /mo What's the best binary file viewer? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best C editor for Windows? rank 20 0 /mo What is the best code compare tool? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best code compare tool for Windows? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best code editing software? rank 10 0 /mo What is the best code editor for PC? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best code editor for Windows 7? rank 14 0 /mo Which code editor with FTP is best? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best code text editor for Mac? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best code text editor for Windows? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best coding text editor for Mac? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best disk benchmark software? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best editor for computer? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best editor for Windows 10? rank 6 0 /mo What is the best editor for Windows 7? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best editor for Windows 8? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best file copy software for Windows 10? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best file diff tool for Windows? rank 7 0 /mo What's the best file compare app for Mac? rank 7 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best text editor for Mac?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. apple.com
    2. support.apple.com
    3. microsoft.com
    4. google.com
    5. sublimetext.com
    6. code.visualstudio.com
    7. jetbrains.com
    8. bbedit.com

    Where Ultraedit.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #18
    most common spot
    1%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    1
    #3
    0
    #4
    2
    #5
    1
    #6
    3
    #7
    5
    #8
    6
    #9
    6
    #10
    7
    #11
    5
    #12
    10
    #13
    12
    #14
    11
    #15
    6
    #16
    12
    #17
    12
    #18
    15
    #19
    11
    #20
    4

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Ultraedit.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    notepad-plus-plus.org
    104 shared
    sublimetext.com
    95 shared
    code.visualstudio.com
    94 shared
    github.com
    87 shared
    atom.io
    87 shared
    vim.org
    85 shared
    brackets.io
    80 shared
    jetbrains.com
    69 shared
    microsoft.com
    65 shared
    sourceforge.net
    63 shared
    gnu.org
    55 shared
    kate-editor.org
    47 shared
    geany.org
    44 shared
    gedit-text-editor.org
    39 shared
    bbedit.com
    38 shared
    visualstudio.com
    37 shared
    textmate.org
    36 shared
    neovim.io
    33 shared
    textpad.com
    30 shared
    notepadqq.com
    27 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →