New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
HomeLeaderboard › Tesseract-ocr.github.io

Tesseract-ocr.github.io

Recommended by ChatGPT across 29 prompt topics people ask about
353
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
29
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
250K
Est. value / mo
$71
Avg rank
11.86
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Tesseract-ocr.github.io

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best free optical character recognition software? rank 3 3 /mo What's the best text recognition tool? rank 4 3 /mo What's the best AI for extracting text from image? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best AI handwriting recognition? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best AI image to text converter? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best AI tool to extract text from an image? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best AI tool to convert image to text? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best AI tool to extract text from image? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best handwriting recognition software? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best handwriting recognition software for Android? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best image extraction software? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best image to text converter software for PC? rank 7 0 /mo What's the best image to text software? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best intelligent character recognition software? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best intelligent character recognition software download? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best free intelligent character recognition software download? rank 3 0 /mo What's the best program to edit scanned documents? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best software to extract text from PDF? rank 17 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for Which optical character recognition tool is best?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. adobe.com
    2. google.com
    3. microsoft.com
    4. amazon.com
    5. abbyy.com
    6. tesseract-ocr.github.io ← this site
    7. opencv.org
    8. azure.com

    Where Tesseract-ocr.github.io ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #19
    most common spot
    7%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    2
    #4
    2
    #5
    2
    #6
    3
    #7
    1
    #8
    1
    #9
    2
    #10
    0
    #11
    1
    #12
    1
    #13
    0
    #14
    0
    #15
    1
    #16
    3
    #17
    2
    #18
    3
    #19
    5
    #20
    0

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Tesseract-ocr.github.io, ranked by how many topics they share.

    microsoft.com
    28 shared
    adobe.com
    28 shared
    abbyy.com
    26 shared
    google.com
    25 shared
    ocr.space
    24 shared
    amazon.com
    18 shared
    nanonets.com
    16 shared
    veryfi.com
    13 shared
    aws.amazon.com
    12 shared
    rossum.ai
    12 shared
    github.com
    12 shared
    mindee.com
    11 shared
    cloud.google.com
    10 shared
    onlineocr.net
    10 shared
    kofax.com
    10 shared
    openai.com
    9 shared
    huggingface.co
    8 shared
    mathpix.com
    7 shared
    ironsoftware.com
    7 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →