New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Taylorfrancis.com

Taylorfrancis.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 312 prompt topics people ask about
5
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
312
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
56K
Est. value / mo
$1
Avg rank
15.13
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Taylorfrancis.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What are the best 3D animation books? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best aerodynamics book? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best aerodynamics textbook? rank 13 0 /mo What are the best aeronautical engineering books? rank 15 0 /mo What are the best agribusiness books? rank 11 0 /mo What are the best applied math books? rank 12 0 /mo What are the best applied mathematics books? rank 11 0 /mo What are the best applied physics books? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best applied psychology book? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best athlete nutrition book? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best attachment theory book? rank 18 0 /mo What are the best behavior analysis books? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best behavioural psychology books? rank 17 0 /mo What are the best bioengineering books? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best biophysics textbook? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best book for biostatistics? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best book for case studies? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best book for building construction? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best book for building materials? rank 7 0 /mo What's the best book for business analysis? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best book for business intelligence? rank 18 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best scientific book?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. books.google.com
    2. amazon.com
    3. goodreads.com
    4. springer.com
    5. sciencedirect.com
    6. cambridge.org
    7. oxfordacademic.com
    8. wiley.com

    Where Taylorfrancis.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #18
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    0
    #5
    1
    #6
    4
    #7
    2
    #8
    6
    #9
    9
    #10
    15
    #11
    19
    #12
    19
    #13
    28
    #14
    26
    #15
    23
    #16
    29
    #17
    32
    #18
    35
    #19
    29
    #20
    35

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Taylorfrancis.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    wiley.com
    311 shared
    amazon.com
    309 shared
    springer.com
    298 shared
    cambridge.org
    287 shared
    books.google.com
    287 shared
    goodreads.com
    275 shared
    barnesandnoble.com
    274 shared
    worldcat.org
    261 shared
    bookshop.org
    253 shared
    oup.com
    200 shared
    google.com
    191 shared
    elsevier.com
    189 shared
    pearson.com
    182 shared
    routledge.com
    179 shared
    sagepub.com
    154 shared
    crcpress.com
    134 shared
    abebooks.com
    130 shared
    penguinrandomhouse.com
    113 shared
    sciencedirect.com
    86 shared
    archive.org
    79 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →