New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Sqlmap.org

Sqlmap.org

Recommended by ChatGPT across 30 prompt topics people ask about
7
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
30
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
25K
Est. value / mo
$12
Avg rank
12.97
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Sqlmap.org

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best penetration testing tool? rank 11 2 /mo What are the best pen test tools? rank 16 1 /mo What's the best database vulnerability scanner? rank 18 0 /mo What are the best free penetration testing tools? rank 6 0 /mo What's the best hacker software? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best hacking software? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best hacking software download? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best open source penetration testing tools? rank 6 0 /mo What are the best open source security tools? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best open source scanner software? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best open source scanning software? rank 11 0 /mo What are the best open source security testing tools? rank 4 0 /mo What's the best open source web security testing tool? rank 6 0 /mo What's the best open source web vulnerability scanner? rank 7 0 /mo What's the best penetration testing tools for Windows? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best security testing tool? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best vulnerability scanner for Kali? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best web app scanner? rank 20 0 /mo What are the best web application penetration testing tools? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best web application scanner? rank 19 0 /mo What are the best web application scanning tools? rank 17 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What are the best pen testing tools?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. pentest-tools.com
    2. owasp.org
    3. kali.org
    4. nmap.org
    5. metasploit.com
    6. burpsuite.com
    7. portswigger.net
    8. wireshark.org

    Where Sqlmap.org ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #18
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    1
    #5
    1
    #6
    3
    #7
    1
    #8
    1
    #9
    0
    #10
    2
    #11
    2
    #12
    3
    #13
    2
    #14
    1
    #15
    0
    #16
    3
    #17
    3
    #18
    4
    #19
    2
    #20
    1

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Sqlmap.org, ranked by how many topics they share.

    owasp.org
    29 shared
    acunetix.com
    27 shared
    nmap.org
    27 shared
    portswigger.net
    27 shared
    rapid7.com
    25 shared
    tenable.com
    25 shared
    github.com
    22 shared
    burpsuite.com
    22 shared
    zaproxy.org
    22 shared
    nessus.org
    21 shared
    metasploit.com
    19 shared
    invicti.com
    16 shared
    w3af.org
    13 shared
    kali.org
    12 shared
    qualys.com
    11 shared
    hackerone.com
    11 shared
    wireshark.org
    11 shared
    netsparker.com
    10 shared
    openvas.org
    10 shared
    snyk.io
    9 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →