New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Soda.com

Soda.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 33 prompt topics people ask about
7
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
33
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
33K
Est. value / mo
$0
Avg rank
16.88
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Soda.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best free PDF reader? rank 13 3 /mo What's the best free PDF watermark remover? rank 9 1 /mo What's the best Adobe Acrobat Pro alternative? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best alternative to Adobe PDF Reader? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best app to turn picture into PDF? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best PDF software to buy? rank 18 0 /mo What is the best file password protection software? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best free app to convert image to PDF? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best free PDF editor software? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best free PDF editor without a watermark? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best free PDF converter app for Android? rank 17 0 /mo What is the best free PDF viewer and editor for Windows 10? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best free tool to edit PDF? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best mobile PDF reader? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best paid PDF reader? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best PDF app for a laptop? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best PDF editor for Kindle Fire? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best PDF creator software for Windows 10? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best PDF creator software review? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best PDF edit tool? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best PDF protection software? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best PDF editor with no subscription? rank 19 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best free PDF reader?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. adobe.com
    2. foxit.com
    3. xodo.com
    4. pdfgear.com
    5. smallpdf.com
    6. ilovepdf.com
    7. pdf24.org
    8. sumatrapdfreader.org

    Where Soda.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #18
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    0
    #5
    0
    #6
    0
    #7
    0
    #8
    0
    #9
    1
    #10
    0
    #11
    1
    #12
    1
    #13
    2
    #14
    2
    #15
    1
    #16
    5
    #17
    1
    #18
    8
    #19
    5
    #20
    6

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Soda.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    smallpdf.com
    33 shared
    ilovepdf.com
    32 shared
    foxit.com
    32 shared
    adobe.com
    31 shared
    xodo.com
    29 shared
    sejda.com
    26 shared
    pdf24.org
    26 shared
    pdfgear.com
    26 shared
    nitropdf.com
    20 shared
    acrobat.adobe.com
    17 shared
    pdfsam.org
    16 shared
    kofax.com
    15 shared
    pdfescape.com
    14 shared
    sodapdf.com
    14 shared
    microsoft.com
    14 shared
    pdfforge.org
    13 shared
    nitro.com
    13 shared
    kdanmobile.com
    12 shared
    pdffiller.com
    11 shared
    pdfexpert.com
    9 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →