New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
HomeLeaderboard › Sans.edu

Sans.edu

Recommended by ChatGPT across 82 prompt topics people ask about
67
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
82
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
43K
Est. value / mo
$166
Avg rank
11.93
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Sans.edu

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What are the best cyber security university programs? rank 1 6 /mo What's the best online cybersecurity program? rank 8 2 /mo What's the best digital forensics course? rank 6 1 /mo What's the best ethical hacker certification? rank 13 1 /mo What's the best penetration testing certification? rank 9 1 /mo What are the best security awareness training programs? rank 9 1 /mo What are the best security training courses? rank 6 1 /mo What's the best application security certification? rank 7 0 /mo What are the best beginner cyber security certifications? rank 12 0 /mo What are the best blue team certifications? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best blue team training platform? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best boot camp for cyber security? rank 9 0 /mo What are the best cybersecurity certificates? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best certification path for cyber security? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best computer security course? rank 6 0 /mo What's the best computer security program? rank 6 0 /mo What are the best computer security schools? rank 12 0 /mo What are the best free online cyber security courses? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best online cyber security course for beginners? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best cyber security blog? rank 14 0 /mo What are the best cyber security certificate programs? rank 10 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What are the best information security tools?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. cisa.gov
    2. nist.gov
    3. sans.org
    4. owasp.org
    5. enisa.europa.eu
    6. isaca.org
    7. sans.edu ← this site
    8. cisecurity.org

    Where Sans.edu ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #12
    most common spot
    1%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    1
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    0
    #5
    4
    #6
    6
    #7
    3
    #8
    5
    #9
    7
    #10
    5
    #11
    8
    #12
    12
    #13
    1
    #14
    4
    #15
    6
    #16
    4
    #17
    4
    #18
    7
    #19
    2
    #20
    3

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Sans.edu, ranked by how many topics they share.

    sans.org
    72 shared
    coursera.org
    59 shared
    cybrary.it
    55 shared
    isc2.org
    55 shared
    ec-council.org
    53 shared
    comptia.org
    48 shared
    isaca.org
    44 shared
    udemy.com
    43 shared
    cisa.gov
    41 shared
    microsoft.com
    38 shared
    offsec.com
    36 shared
    edx.org
    36 shared
    linkedin.com
    33 shared
    simplilearn.com
    32 shared
    hackthebox.com
    27 shared
    ibm.com
    26 shared
    nist.gov
    24 shared
    tryhackme.com
    23 shared
    ine.com
    23 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →