New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Nwf.org

Nwf.org

Recommended by ChatGPT across 55 prompt topics people ask about
31
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
55
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
23K
Est. value / mo
$13
Avg rank
11.69
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Nwf.org

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What are the best environmental funds? rank 5 2 /mo What are the best pollinator garden plants? rank 7 2 /mo What's the best bat removal service? rank 10 1 /mo What are the best outdoor classrooms? rank 9 1 /mo What's the best trees for birds? rank 7 1 /mo What are the best trees for butterflies? rank 3 1 /mo What are the best animals for beginners? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best bird bath for bees? rank 12 0 /mo What are the best books about wildlife conservation? rank 16 0 /mo What are the best charities for wildlife? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best charity for polar bears? rank 17 0 /mo What is the best deer estrus? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best drought resistant fescue? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best food for raccoons? rank 13 0 /mo What are the best hedges for wildlife? rank 6 0 /mo What are the best nature charities? rank 5 0 /mo What are the best nature charities to donate to? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best nature charity? rank 14 0 /mo What are the best nature conservation charities? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best nature conservation organizations? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best online wildlife conservation degree? rank 11 0 /mo What are the best plants for a wild garden? rank 16 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What are the best nature centers?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. nature.org
    2. audubon.org
    3. parksconservancy.org
    4. naturecenterfoundation.org
    5. nps.gov
    6. fws.gov
    7. stateparks.com
    8. naturecenter.org

    Where Nwf.org ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #13
    most common spot
    5%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    1
    #3
    2
    #4
    0
    #5
    5
    #6
    3
    #7
    3
    #8
    2
    #9
    1
    #10
    2
    #11
    4
    #12
    3
    #13
    11
    #14
    2
    #15
    5
    #16
    3
    #17
    2
    #18
    0
    #19
    2
    #20
    4

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Nwf.org, ranked by how many topics they share.

    audubon.org
    40 shared
    xerces.org
    20 shared
    rhs.org.uk
    18 shared
    missouribotanicalgarden.org
    17 shared
    gardenia.net
    17 shared
    thespruce.com
    17 shared
    wwf.org
    17 shared
    extension.umn.edu
    16 shared
    nature.org
    15 shared
    worldwildlife.org
    14 shared
    gardenersworld.com
    14 shared
    extension.psu.edu
    14 shared
    monrovia.com
    14 shared
    wildflower.org
    13 shared
    gardeningknowhow.com
    13 shared
    wildlifetrusts.org
    12 shared
    almanac.com
    12 shared
    usda.gov
    11 shared
    defenders.org
    11 shared
    extension.org
    11 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →