New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Nobts.edu

Nobts.edu

Recommended by ChatGPT across 32 prompt topics people ask about
8
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
32
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
7.6K
Est. value / mo
$39
Avg rank
10.38
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Nobts.edu

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What are the best online bible colleges? rank 4 2 /mo What are the best online Bible schools? rank 7 1 /mo What's the best seminary online? rank 6 1 /mo What are the best theological seminaries? rank 7 1 /mo What are the best apologetics programs? rank 6 0 /mo What are the best Bible colleges in the US? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best biblical counseling program? rank 15 0 /mo What are the best Christian counseling schools? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best Christian graduate school? rank 10 0 /mo What are the best Christian seminaries? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best Christian seminary? rank 5 0 /mo Which Christian theology schools are best? rank 13 0 /mo What are the best colleges for youth ministry? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best Doctor of Ministry program? rank 6 0 /mo What's the best free seminary courses online? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best online bible courses? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best online Master of Divinity program? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best online seminary program? rank 4 0 /mo What's the best online theological seminary? rank 5 0 /mo What's the best online theology course? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best online theology degree? rank 19 0 /mo What are the best online theology degree programs? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best online theology programs? rank 9 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What are the best seminary schools?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. seminary.edu
    2. carey.ac.nz
    3. fuller.edu
    4. gcts.edu
    5. union-psce.edu
    6. sbts.edu
    7. cts.edu
    8. prts.edu

    Where Nobts.edu ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #9
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    2
    #5
    2
    #6
    3
    #7
    3
    #8
    0
    #9
    4
    #10
    2
    #11
    4
    #12
    4
    #13
    2
    #14
    0
    #15
    3
    #16
    0
    #17
    1
    #18
    0
    #19
    1
    #20
    1

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Nobts.edu, ranked by how many topics they share.

    biola.edu
    29 shared
    dts.edu
    27 shared
    sbts.edu
    26 shared
    gordonconwell.edu
    26 shared
    liberty.edu
    24 shared
    fuller.edu
    21 shared
    moody.edu
    20 shared
    wheaton.edu
    19 shared
    wts.edu
    19 shared
    anderson.edu
    17 shared
    bethel.edu
    16 shared
    asburyseminary.edu
    16 shared
    seminary.edu
    10 shared
    gcu.edu
    10 shared
    andersonuniversity.edu
    9 shared
    regent.edu
    9 shared
    gcts.edu
    9 shared
    oc.edu
    8 shared
    yale.edu
    8 shared
    southwestern.edu
    7 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →