New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Liquidplanner.com

Liquidplanner.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 71 prompt topics people ask about
26
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
71
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
120K
Est. value / mo
$70
Avg rank
16.28
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Liquidplanner.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

Which PPM software is best? rank 12 1 /mo What's the best tools for project management? rank 18 1 /mo What's the best business project management software? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best cloud-based project management tool? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best collaborative project management tools? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best construction scheduling software for Mac? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best freelance project management software? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best IT project management software? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best Mac project management software? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best mobile project management software? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best MS Project alternative? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best multi project management software? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best online project management system? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best online project scheduling software? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best planners for project managers? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best PPM tool? rank 16 0 /mo What are the best program management tools? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best project and portfolio management products? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best project management software for multiple projects? rank 17 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best program management software?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. monday.com
    2. asana.com
    3. clickup.com
    4. microsoft.com
    5. wrike.com
    6. smartsheet.com
    7. microsoft365.com
    8. planview.com

    Where Liquidplanner.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #18
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    0
    #5
    0
    #6
    0
    #7
    0
    #8
    1
    #9
    1
    #10
    2
    #11
    4
    #12
    3
    #13
    3
    #14
    3
    #15
    8
    #16
    5
    #17
    8
    #18
    13
    #19
    12
    #20
    8

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Liquidplanner.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    microsoft.com
    71 shared
    monday.com
    71 shared
    wrike.com
    71 shared
    smartsheet.com
    71 shared
    clickup.com
    70 shared
    asana.com
    70 shared
    zoho.com
    67 shared
    proofhub.com
    62 shared
    basecamp.com
    61 shared
    projectmanager.com
    55 shared
    teamwork.com
    55 shared
    atlassian.com
    51 shared
    notion.so
    47 shared
    trello.com
    43 shared
    mavenlink.com
    39 shared
    airtable.com
    34 shared
    paymoapp.com
    31 shared
    planview.com
    30 shared
    teamgantt.com
    27 shared
    workfront.com
    23 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →