New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Link.springer.com

Link.springer.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 98 prompt topics people ask about
19
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
98
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
30K
Est. value / mo
$8
Avg rank
14.36
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Link.springer.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What are the best anesthesiology journals? rank 3 4 /mo What's the best anesthesia journals? rank 4 1 /mo What are the best organic chemistry journals? rank 11 1 /mo What are the best research article sites? rank 7 1 /mo Which scholarly article database is best? rank 6 1 /mo What are the best journals? rank 17 0 /mo What are the best academic databases? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best academic research database? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best app for reading journal articles? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best book for biostatistics? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best book on image processing? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best book for operations research? rank 17 0 /mo What is the best book for medicinal chemistry? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best book on data mining? rank 9 0 /mo What are the best books for network analysis? rank 16 0 /mo What are the best books for research papers? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best book on electromagnetic theory? rank 15 0 /mo What are the best books on parallel computing? rank 18 0 /mo What are the best books on solid state physics? rank 17 0 /mo What are the best books on time series analysis? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best calculus book PDF? rank 9 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best scholarly articles?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. scholar.google.com
    2. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    3. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    4. springer.com
    5. sciencedirect.com
    6. jstor.org
    7. wiley.com
    8. tandfonline.com

    Where Link.springer.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #17
    most common spot
    1%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    1
    #4
    1
    #5
    1
    #6
    1
    #7
    3
    #8
    1
    #9
    6
    #10
    3
    #11
    4
    #12
    5
    #13
    9
    #14
    8
    #15
    9
    #16
    8
    #17
    20
    #18
    7
    #19
    6
    #20
    5

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Link.springer.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    springer.com
    93 shared
    wiley.com
    89 shared
    sciencedirect.com
    85 shared
    tandfonline.com
    64 shared
    cambridge.org
    63 shared
    sagepub.com
    53 shared
    pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    52 shared
    nature.com
    47 shared
    jstor.org
    47 shared
    scholar.google.com
    45 shared
    researchgate.net
    45 shared
    onlinelibrary.wiley.com
    44 shared
    mdpi.com
    37 shared
    doaj.org
    35 shared
    arxiv.org
    34 shared
    oup.com
    33 shared
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    32 shared
    elsevier.com
    30 shared
    semanticscholar.org
    29 shared
    books.google.com
    29 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →