New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Lifewatch.eu

Lifewatch.eu

Recommended by ChatGPT across 1 prompt topics people ask about
0
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
1
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
40
Est. value / mo
$0
Avg rank
6.00
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Lifewatch.eu

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best taxonomy tools? rank 6 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best taxonomy tools?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. gbif.org
    2. catalogueoflife.org
    3. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    4. itis.gov
    5. lifewatch.eu ← this site
    6. boldsystems.org
    7. openbiodiv.net
    8. en.wikipedia.org

    Where Lifewatch.eu ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #6
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    0
    #5
    0
    #6
    1
    #7
    0
    #8
    0
    #9
    0
    #10
    0
    #11
    0
    #12
    0
    #13
    0
    #14
    0
    #15
    0
    #16
    0
    #17
    0
    #18
    0
    #19
    0
    #20
    0

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Lifewatch.eu, ranked by how many topics they share.

    biodiversitylibrary.org
    1 shared
    fishbase.se
    1 shared
    researchgate.net
    1 shared
    wikidata.org
    1 shared
    itis.gov
    1 shared
    zoobank.org
    1 shared
    eol.org
    1 shared
    gbif.org
    1 shared
    algaebase.org
    1 shared
    springer.com
    1 shared
    mycobank.org
    1 shared
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
    1 shared
    taxonworks.org
    1 shared
    boldsystems.org
    1 shared
    nature.com
    1 shared
    catalogueoflife.org
    1 shared
    sciencedirect.com
    1 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →