New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Kolabnow.com

Kolabnow.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 58 prompt topics people ask about
27
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
58
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
35K
Est. value / mo
$60
Avg rank
15.19
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Kolabnow.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best ad-free email service? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best ad free email service? rank 17 0 /mo What are the best alternative email providers? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best conservative email provider? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best email alternative? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best email alternative to Gmail? rank 17 0 /mo What are the best email alternatives? rank 18 0 /mo Which email provider is best for privacy? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best email provider without a phone number? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best email without ads? rank 16 0 /mo Which encrypted email app is best? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best encrypted email provider? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best encrypted email service for small business? rank 14 0 /mo What are the best encrypted email services? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best encrypted email solution? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best end to end encryption email? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best free conservative email provider? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best free email with no spam? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best free encrypted email? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best free encrypted email provider? rank 12 0 /mo What are the best free encrypted email services? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best free Gmail alternative? rank 19 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best encrypted mail service?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. proton.me
    2. tutanota.com
    3. mailfence.com
    4. startmail.com
    5. riseup.net
    6. ctemplar.com
    7. posteo.de
    8. disroot.org

    Where Kolabnow.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #17
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    0
    #5
    0
    #6
    0
    #7
    0
    #8
    1
    #9
    2
    #10
    2
    #11
    1
    #12
    5
    #13
    9
    #14
    7
    #15
    2
    #16
    3
    #17
    11
    #18
    4
    #19
    8
    #20
    3

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Kolabnow.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    mailfence.com
    58 shared
    posteo.de
    58 shared
    proton.me
    58 shared
    startmail.com
    58 shared
    zoho.com
    53 shared
    countermail.com
    52 shared
    mailbox.org
    51 shared
    runbox.com
    51 shared
    fastmail.com
    49 shared
    tutanota.com
    45 shared
    skiff.com
    45 shared
    disroot.org
    44 shared
    tuta.com
    43 shared
    gmail.com
    40 shared
    outlook.com
    39 shared
    hey.com
    34 shared
    ctemplar.com
    32 shared
    icloud.com
    31 shared
    lavabit.com
    30 shared
    protonmail.com
    25 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →