New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
HomeLeaderboard › Jobnimbus.com

Jobnimbus.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 167 prompt topics people ask about
25
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
167
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
25K
Est. value / mo
$249
Avg rank
10.75
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Jobnimbus.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best construction CRM? rank 3 2 /mo What's the best CRM for construction? rank 3 2 /mo What's the best CRM for the construction industry? rank 3 2 /mo What's the best roofing CRM? rank 1 2 /mo What's the best accounting software for builders? rank 9 1 /mo Which construction CRM software is best? rank 4 1 /mo What's the best CRM for roofers? rank 2 1 /mo What's the best free home builder software? rank 9 1 /mo What's the best roofing contractor software? rank 1 1 /mo What's the best roofing CRM software? rank 1 1 /mo What's the best software for builders? rank 9 1 /mo What's the best accounting software for construction companies? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best accounting software for the construction industry? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best accounting software for general contractors? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best accounting software for interior designers? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best accounting software for a small construction business? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best AI construction estimating software? rank 18 0 /mo What are the best apps for construction management? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best bid estimating software? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best builder software? rank 17 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best software for a construction company?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. procore.com
    2. autodesk.com
    3. buildertrend.com
    4. coconstruct.com
    5. jobber.com
    6. sitemate.com
    7. planradar.com
    8. smartsheet.com

    Where Jobnimbus.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #9
    most common spot
    14%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    6
    #2
    9
    #3
    8
    #4
    7
    #5
    4
    #6
    2
    #7
    9
    #8
    8
    #9
    18
    #10
    10
    #11
    11
    #12
    10
    #13
    8
    #14
    6
    #15
    11
    #16
    10
    #17
    10
    #18
    10
    #19
    5
    #20
    5

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Jobnimbus.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    buildertrend.com
    132 shared
    procore.com
    123 shared
    autodesk.com
    112 shared
    sage.com
    88 shared
    monday.com
    77 shared
    simprogroup.com
    75 shared
    housecallpro.com
    71 shared
    stackct.com
    65 shared
    jobber.com
    60 shared
    coconstruct.com
    57 shared
    servicefusion.com
    54 shared
    zoho.com
    50 shared
    trimble.com
    50 shared
    oracle.com
    49 shared
    viewpoint.com
    41 shared
    smartsheet.com
    40 shared
    bluebeam.com
    40 shared
    fieldwire.com
    40 shared
    hubspot.com
    40 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →