New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
HomeLeaderboard › Hireright.com

Hireright.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 68 prompt topics people ask about
85
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
68
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
82K
Est. value / mo
$233
Avg rank
9.79
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Hireright.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best background checker? rank 9 40 /mo Which employment background check company is best? rank 1 3 /mo What's the best employment verification services? rank 3 3 /mo What's the best background check software? rank 3 2 /mo What are the best employer background check companies? rank 2 2 /mo What's the best accurate background check? rank 11 1 /mo What's the best background check vendors? rank 3 1 /mo What's the best background checking site? rank 5 1 /mo What's the best background check company for employers? rank 5 1 /mo What are the best employee background check companies? rank 3 1 /mo What's the best background check for caregivers? rank 5 0 /mo What's the best background check for individuals? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best background check for nannies? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best background check service for small business? rank 13 0 /mo What are the best background check services for small businesses? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best background check site? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best background check sites for employers? rank 3 0 /mo What's the best social media background check? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best background check tool? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best background check website? rank 13 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best background checker?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. checkr.com
    2. backgroundchecks.com
    3. goodhire.com
    4. accurate.com
    5. transunion.com
    6. hireright.com ← this site
    7. truthfinder.com
    8. instantcheckmate.com

    Where Hireright.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #5
    most common spot
    12%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    1
    #2
    1
    #3
    6
    #4
    1
    #5
    8
    #6
    7
    #7
    2
    #8
    4
    #9
    7
    #10
    4
    #11
    2
    #12
    2
    #13
    6
    #14
    3
    #15
    3
    #16
    3
    #17
    0
    #18
    3
    #19
    3
    #20
    2

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Hireright.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    goodhire.com
    68 shared
    checkr.com
    68 shared
    sterlingcheck.com
    62 shared
    accurate.com
    59 shared
    beenverified.com
    56 shared
    truthfinder.com
    54 shared
    intelius.com
    54 shared
    transunion.com
    50 shared
    ussearch.com
    40 shared
    firstadvantage.com
    40 shared
    fadv.com
    40 shared
    spokeo.com
    35 shared
    peoplefinders.com
    35 shared
    hireology.com
    32 shared
    checkpeople.com
    24 shared
    lexisnexis.com
    17 shared
    radaris.com
    16 shared
    equifax.com
    15 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →