New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Findbugs.sourceforge.net

Findbugs.sourceforge.net

Recommended by ChatGPT across 11 prompt topics people ask about
1
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
11
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
6.7K
Est. value / mo
$2
Avg rank
13.45
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Findbugs.sourceforge.net

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

Which code analysis tools are best? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best Java code analysis tool? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best Java static analysis tool? rank 6 0 /mo What's the best Java static code analysis? rank 8 0 /mo Which Java static code analysis tool is best? rank 7 0 /mo What's the best open source static code analysis tool? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best source code analysis tools? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best static analysis tool? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best static code analysis tool? rank 14 0 /mo What are the best static code analyzers? rank 13 0 /mo

Also occasionally recommended

ChatGPT named Findbugs.sourceforge.net here in only some runs (below our 2-of-5 confidence bar), so these earn no estimated traffic, but they show where it occasionally surfaces this site.

What's the best static code analysis tools for security? seen rank 17 2 of 5 runs What's the best code quality tool for Java? seen rank 10 1 of 5 runs What's the best Java code analyzer? seen rank 10 1 of 5 runs What are the best code quality tools? seen rank 11 1 of 5 runs What are the best dynamic code analysis tools? seen rank 15 1 of 5 runs Which static code analysis software is best? seen rank 18 1 of 5 runs What's the best linter for Java? seen rank 19 1 of 5 runs

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best code scanner?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. github.com
    2. sourceforge.net
    3. stackoverflow.com
    4. sonarsource.com
    5. semgrep.dev
    6. owasp.org
    7. checkmarx.com
    8. veracode.com

    Where Findbugs.sourceforge.net ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #14
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    0
    #5
    0
    #6
    1
    #7
    1
    #8
    1
    #9
    0
    #10
    0
    #11
    0
    #12
    0
    #13
    1
    #14
    3
    #15
    0
    #16
    1
    #17
    0
    #18
    2
    #19
    0
    #20
    1

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Findbugs.sourceforge.net, ranked by how many topics they share.

    sonarsource.com
    11 shared
    pmd.github.io
    10 shared
    jetbrains.com
    10 shared
    spotbugs.github.io
    10 shared
    semgrep.dev
    10 shared
    github.com
    10 shared
    snyk.io
    9 shared
    owasp.org
    8 shared
    codacy.com
    8 shared
    eslint.org
    7 shared
    clang.llvm.org
    7 shared
    coverity.com
    7 shared
    checkstyle.org
    6 shared
    cppcheck.sourceforge.io
    6 shared
    codeql.github.com
    6 shared
    checkmarx.com
    6 shared
    fortify.com
    5 shared
    sourceforge.net
    4 shared
    synopsys.com
    4 shared
    errorprone.info
    4 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →