New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Fastapi.tiangolo.com

Fastapi.tiangolo.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 56 prompt topics people ask about
95
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
56
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
14K
Est. value / mo
$19
Avg rank
8.29
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Fastapi.tiangolo.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What are the best Python frameworks? rank 3 15 /mo What's the best Python REST API? rank 1 9 /mo What's the best Python server? rank 3 4 /mo What's the best Python web server? rank 3 4 /mo What is the best route API? rank 3 4 /mo What's the best Python API framework? rank 1 3 /mo What's the best API framework? rank 1 2 /mo What's the best Python web development framework? rank 2 2 /mo What's the best Python REST API framework? rank 1 1 /mo What's the best REST API framework? rank 1 1 /mo What's the best RESTful API framework? rank 1 1 /mo Which web framework is best? rank 12 1 /mo What's the best API hosting platform? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best API authentication method? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best API development framework? rank 1 0 /mo What's the best back end developer tools? rank 17 0 /mo What are the best back end frameworks? rank 7 0 /mo What are the best chatbot libraries in Python? rank 13 0 /mo Which framework is best for developing web applications? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best framework for RESTful web services? rank 5 0 /mo What's the best framework to develop a web application? rank 14 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best Python framework?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. pypi.org
    2. docs.python.org
    3. python.org
    4. djangoproject.com
    5. flask.palletsprojects.com
    6. fastapi.tiangolo.com ← this site
    7. pyramid.readthedocs.io
    8. pylonsproject.org

    Where Fastapi.tiangolo.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #1
    most common spot
    36%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    9
    #2
    4
    #3
    7
    #4
    4
    #5
    2
    #6
    0
    #7
    1
    #8
    2
    #9
    2
    #10
    3
    #11
    1
    #12
    4
    #13
    5
    #14
    3
    #15
    0
    #16
    1
    #17
    3
    #18
    0
    #19
    4
    #20
    1

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Fastapi.tiangolo.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    flask.palletsprojects.com
    43 shared
    pypi.org
    25 shared
    spring.io
    25 shared
    expressjs.com
    24 shared
    github.com
    23 shared
    laravel.com
    21 shared
    djangoproject.com
    20 shared
    sanic.dev
    17 shared
    realpython.com
    16 shared
    bottlepy.org
    16 shared
    rubyonrails.org
    16 shared
    nestjs.com
    16 shared
    asp.net
    15 shared
    tornadoweb.org
    15 shared
    palletsprojects.com
    15 shared
    falconframework.org
    14 shared
    nextjs.org
    13 shared
    vuejs.org
    13 shared
    quarkus.io
    13 shared
    playframework.com
    12 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →