New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
HomeLeaderboard › Evidentscientific.com

Evidentscientific.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 27 prompt topics people ask about
59
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
27
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
83K
Est. value / mo
$37
Avg rank
8.74
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Evidentscientific.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best microscope?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. olympus-lifescience.com
    2. zeiss.com
    3. leica-microsystems.com
    4. nikoninstruments.com
    5. thermofisher.com
    6. motic.com
    7. beininger.com
    8. amscope.com

    Where Evidentscientific.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #8
    most common spot
    7%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    2
    #4
    0
    #5
    1
    #6
    3
    #7
    3
    #8
    5
    #9
    5
    #10
    0
    #11
    2
    #12
    1
    #13
    3
    #14
    2
    #15
    0
    #16
    0
    #17
    0
    #18
    0
    #19
    0
    #20
    0

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Evidentscientific.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    zeiss.com
    24 shared
    amscope.com
    21 shared
    thermofisher.com
    19 shared
    nikon.com
    18 shared
    motic.com
    18 shared
    vwr.com
    16 shared
    labomed.com
    14 shared
    keyence.com
    14 shared
    meiji-techno.com
    10 shared
    carolina.com
    10 shared
    euromex.com
    9 shared
    microscopyu.com
    8 shared
    hamamatsu.com
    7 shared
    carson.com
    7 shared
    tucsen.com
    7 shared
    bruker.com
    7 shared
    fishersci.com
    7 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →