New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Duden.de

Duden.de

Recommended by ChatGPT across 30 prompt topics people ask about
548
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
30
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
56K
Est. value / mo
$231
Avg rank
9.97
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Duden.de

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best German grammar checker? rank 2 7 /mo What's the best German text corrector? rank 1 1 /mo What's the best German-to-German dictionary? rank 1 1 /mo What are the best books for German beginners? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best English German dictionary app? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best English to German dictionary? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best free online German-English dictionary? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best German book for beginners? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best German book for learning? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best German dictionary app for Android? rank 4 0 /mo What's the best German dictionary app? rank 4 0 /mo What is the best German dictionary for Kindle? rank 5 0 /mo What's the best German English dictionary app? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best German-English dictionary app for offline use? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best German-English dictionary book? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best German-English dictionary online? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best German-German dictionary? rank 4 0 /mo What's the best German grammar app? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best German grammar book? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best German grammar book for beginners? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best German grammar exercise book? rank 5 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best braunschweiger?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. wikipedia.org
    2. duden.de ← this site
    3. dwds.de
    4. wiktionary.org
    5. chefkoch.de
    6. essen-und-trinken.de
    7. rewe.de
    8. edeka.de

    Where Duden.de ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #4
    most common spot
    17%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    3
    #2
    2
    #3
    0
    #4
    4
    #5
    3
    #6
    0
    #7
    0
    #8
    1
    #9
    1
    #10
    1
    #11
    0
    #12
    1
    #13
    2
    #14
    1
    #15
    3
    #16
    3
    #17
    2
    #18
    2
    #19
    1
    #20
    0

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Duden.de, ranked by how many topics they share.

    cambridge.org
    24 shared
    langenscheidt.com
    20 shared
    leo.org
    19 shared
    pons.com
    19 shared
    dict.cc
    18 shared
    reverso.net
    17 shared
    collinsdictionary.com
    17 shared
    dwds.de
    17 shared
    oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com
    16 shared
    linguee.com
    14 shared
    bab.la
    14 shared
    wordreference.com
    13 shared
    deepl.com
    13 shared
    thalia.de
    10 shared
    amazon.de
    10 shared
    hugendubel.de
    10 shared
    cornelsen.de
    10 shared
    amazon.com
    9 shared
    dw.com
    9 shared
    thefreedictionary.com
    9 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →