New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
HomeLeaderboard › Docuware.com

Docuware.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 118 prompt topics people ask about
43
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
118
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
38K
Est. value / mo
$120
Avg rank
11.75
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Docuware.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best electronic document management software? rank 3 2 /mo What are the best contract management solutions? rank 4 1 /mo What's the best contract management system? rank 6 1 /mo What's the best electronic document management system? rank 5 1 /mo What's the best healthcare contract management software? rank 2 1 /mo What's the best access forms? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best accounting document management software? rank 4 0 /mo What's the best AI contract management software? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best AI contract review software? rank 15 0 /mo Which AI for contracts is best? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best AI for legal contract review? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best AI for legal documents? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best batch scanning software? rank 18 0 /mo Which cloud based document management software is best? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best cloud-based document management system? rank 13 0 /mo What is the best cloud document management software? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best cloud document management system? rank 13 0 /mo What is the best CMS for document management? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best construction PDF software? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best contract automation software? rank 6 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best document archiving software?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. m-files.com
    2. laserfiche.com
    3. onbase.com
    4. docuware.com ← this site
    5. alfresco.com
    6. openkm.com
    7. microsoft.com
    8. google.com

    Where Docuware.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #10
    most common spot
    4%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    2
    #3
    3
    #4
    6
    #5
    6
    #6
    5
    #7
    5
    #8
    5
    #9
    5
    #10
    13
    #11
    4
    #12
    9
    #13
    13
    #14
    5
    #15
    5
    #16
    6
    #17
    7
    #18
    8
    #19
    5
    #20
    6

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Docuware.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    microsoft.com
    90 shared
    m-files.com
    76 shared
    box.com
    72 shared
    adobe.com
    70 shared
    google.com
    69 shared
    laserfiche.com
    69 shared
    docusign.com
    64 shared
    zoho.com
    63 shared
    dropbox.com
    52 shared
    sharepoint.com
    51 shared
    opentext.com
    47 shared
    airslate.com
    42 shared
    panda-doc.com
    38 shared
    alfresco.com
    37 shared
    evernote.com
    31 shared
    openkm.com
    29 shared
    logicaldoc.com
    27 shared
    pandadoc.com
    27 shared
    filecenter.com
    26 shared
    monday.com
    24 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →