New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Bugcrowd.com

Bugcrowd.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 25 prompt topics people ask about
14
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
25
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
28K
Est. value / mo
$65
Avg rank
13.48
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Bugcrowd.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best penetration testing service? rank 7 2 /mo Which pen testing company is best? rank 4 1 /mo What are the best penetration testing companies? rank 5 1 /mo What's the best AI for penetration testing? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best automated penetration testing tool? rank 20 0 /mo What's the best bug clothing? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best bug detector? rank 17 0 /mo What are the best Chrome extensions for hackers? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best crowdsourced testing service? rank 5 0 /mo What are the best crowd testing platforms? rank 19 0 /mo What are the best freelance testing websites? rank 17 0 /mo What are the best pen test companies? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best pen test scanners? rank 19 0 /mo What are the best pen testing apps for Android? rank 18 0 /mo What's the best pen testing software? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best penetration testing company? rank 19 0 /mo Which penetration testing firm is best? rank 9 0 /mo What are the best penetration testing service providers? rank 11 0 /mo Which penetration testing vendor is best? rank 6 0 /mo What's the best tool for ethical hacking? rank 20 0 /mo What are the best vulnerability scanner tools? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best web security tools? rank 19 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What is the best penetration testing software?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. rapid7.com
    2. tenable.com
    3. burpsuite.com
    4. portswigger.net
    5. nessus.org
    6. nmap.org
    7. acunetix.com
    8. invicti.com

    Where Bugcrowd.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #19
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    1
    #5
    2
    #6
    1
    #7
    1
    #8
    0
    #9
    2
    #10
    0
    #11
    2
    #12
    2
    #13
    1
    #14
    1
    #15
    1
    #16
    0
    #17
    3
    #18
    1
    #19
    5
    #20
    2

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Bugcrowd.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    hackerone.com
    19 shared
    rapid7.com
    19 shared
    owasp.org
    16 shared
    cobalt.io
    16 shared
    portswigger.net
    13 shared
    tenable.com
    11 shared
    nmap.org
    10 shared
    veracode.com
    10 shared
    pentest-tools.com
    9 shared
    synack.com
    9 shared
    acunetix.com
    9 shared
    crowdstrike.com
    9 shared
    nccgroup.com
    8 shared
    trustwave.com
    8 shared
    nessus.org
    8 shared
    secureworks.com
    8 shared
    netspi.com
    8 shared
    bishopfox.com
    8 shared
    qualys.com
    8 shared
    checkmarx.com
    8 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →