New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Birds.cornell.edu

Birds.cornell.edu

Recommended by ChatGPT across 47 prompt topics people ask about
22
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
47
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
23K
Est. value / mo
$7
Avg rank
12.62
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Birds.cornell.edu

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What are the best apps for birders? rank 4 8 /mo What's the best bird identifying app? rank 10 2 /mo What's the best tree swallow nest box? rank 4 2 /mo What's the best bird call identification app? rank 10 1 /mo What's the best bird watcher app? rank 9 1 /mo What's the best bird spotting app? rank 7 1 /mo What's the best free bird identification app? rank 8 1 /mo What are the best nesting boxes? rank 16 1 /mo What's the best trees for birds? rank 9 1 /mo What's the best app for birdsong identification? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best app for identifying birds by sound? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best banded waders? rank 17 0 /mo What are the best berry shrubs for birds? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best bird feed for sparrows? rank 13 0 /mo What's the best bird call app? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best bird call identifier app? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best bird call recognition app? rank 17 0 /mo What's the best bird calling app? rank 12 0 /mo What's the best bird guide app? rank 9 0 /mo What's the best bird guides? rank 14 0 /mo What are the best bird field guides? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best bird finder app? rank 8 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What are the best apps for birders?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. merlin.allaboutbirds.org
    2. allaboutbirds.org
    3. ebird.org
    4. birdnet.cornell.edu
    5. birdlife.org
    6. audubon.org
    7. inaturalist.org
    8. merlinbirdid.com

    Where Birds.cornell.edu ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #9
    most common spot
    0%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    0
    #3
    0
    #4
    2
    #5
    2
    #6
    0
    #7
    1
    #8
    3
    #9
    6
    #10
    4
    #11
    1
    #12
    1
    #13
    3
    #14
    4
    #15
    5
    #16
    5
    #17
    6
    #18
    1
    #19
    3
    #20
    0

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Birds.cornell.edu, ranked by how many topics they share.

    audubon.org
    47 shared
    allaboutbirds.org
    45 shared
    ebird.org
    36 shared
    merlin.allaboutbirds.org
    32 shared
    xeno-canto.org
    31 shared
    inaturalist.org
    26 shared
    birdguides.com
    25 shared
    play.google.com
    25 shared
    apps.apple.com
    24 shared
    birdnet.cornell.edu
    24 shared
    birdwatchingdaily.com
    23 shared
    birdsoftheworld.org
    19 shared
    birdingapps.com
    16 shared
    cornell.edu
    15 shared
    birdlife.org
    14 shared
    merlinbirdid.com
    14 shared
    fws.gov
    11 shared
    birdforum.net
    11 shared
    merlinapp.org
    10 shared
    birdtrack.net
    10 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →