New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Leaderboard › Arborjet.com

Arborjet.com

Recommended by ChatGPT across 44 prompt topics people ask about
34
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
44
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
22K
Est. value / mo
$26
Avg rank
10.05
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Arborjet.com

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

What's the best tree killer? rank 3 8 /mo What's the best tree care professional? rank 4 3 /mo What's the best chelated iron for trees? rank 2 1 /mo What's the best tree growth regulator? rank 2 1 /mo What's the best tree climber? rank 16 1 /mo What's the best tree care company? rank 6 1 /mo What's the best tree wound sealer? rank 6 1 /mo What's the best tree wrap? rank 7 1 /mo What's the best arborist chainsaw? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best bagworm spray? rank 11 0 /mo What's the best boom lift for tree trimming? rank 13 0 /mo What are the best climbers for trees? rank 19 0 /mo What's the best electric pole tree trimmer? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best environmentally friendly lawn fertilizer? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best fertilizer for ash trees? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best fertilizer for planting trees? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best gas tree trimmer? rank 10 0 /mo What's the best herbicide for trees? rank 16 0 /mo What's the best insecticide for birch trees? rank 15 0 /mo What's the best insecticide for thrips on roses? rank 8 0 /mo What's the best lawn fertilizer for root growth? rank 14 0 /mo What's the best liquid fertilizer for food plots? rank 13 0 /mo

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What's the best tree fertilizer?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. trees.com
    2. arborjet.com ← this site
    3. arborday.org
    4. extension.org
    5. gardeningknowhow.com
    6. gardenia.net
    7. scotts.com
    8. domyown.com

    Where Arborjet.com ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #8
    most common spot
    11%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    1
    #2
    3
    #3
    1
    #4
    2
    #5
    0
    #6
    4
    #7
    3
    #8
    5
    #9
    2
    #10
    3
    #11
    3
    #12
    0
    #13
    2
    #14
    4
    #15
    5
    #16
    3
    #17
    2
    #18
    0
    #19
    1
    #20
    0

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Arborjet.com, ranked by how many topics they share.

    arborday.org
    30 shared
    gardeningknowhow.com
    26 shared
    extension.umn.edu
    24 shared
    extension.psu.edu
    23 shared
    homedepot.com
    19 shared
    lowes.com
    18 shared
    thespruce.com
    15 shared
    amazon.com
    14 shared
    treehelp.com
    13 shared
    ohioline.osu.edu
    12 shared
    bonide.com
    12 shared
    scotts.com
    12 shared
    bobvila.com
    11 shared
    treesaregood.org
    11 shared
    davey.com
    11 shared
    espoma.com
    10 shared
    extension.iastate.edu
    10 shared
    extension.oregonstate.edu
    10 shared
    ucanr.edu
    9 shared
    arboristsite.com
    9 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →