New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
HomeLeaderboard › Ams.org

Ams.org

Recommended by ChatGPT across 94 prompt topics people ask about
55
ESTIMATED
ChatGPT referrals / mo
Prompt topics
94
Monthly ChatGPT prompts
44K
Est. value / mo
$11
Avg rank
12.17
These aren't logged prompts (ChatGPT doesn't share those). They're the commercial topics people ask ChatGPT to recommend products for, sized from real search demand and verified by running each one through ChatGPT. How we estimate this.

Prompts where ChatGPT recommends Ams.org

Each topic written the way a person would ask it. Estimated visits = this site's share of that prompt's demand.

Different ways people phrase this prompt. We merge them into one category, and the full ranking covers them all.

View full details for this prompt →
    View full details for this prompt →

    Proof: a real ChatGPT answer

    One of the 5 runs for What are the best mathematics journals?, verbatim.

    ChatGPT:
    1. ams.org ← this site
    2. springer.com
    3. sciencedirect.com
    4. onlinelibrary.wiley.com
    5. cambridge.org
    6. tandfonline.com
    7. projecteuclid.org
    8. mathscinet.ams.org

    Where Ams.org ranks

    How often ChatGPT places this site at each position across its prompt topics.

    #19
    most common spot
    7%
    of the time in the top 3
    #1
    0
    #2
    1
    #3
    6
    #4
    4
    #5
    2
    #6
    3
    #7
    2
    #8
    8
    #9
    7
    #10
    4
    #11
    2
    #12
    7
    #13
    9
    #14
    6
    #15
    2
    #16
    5
    #17
    6
    #18
    5
    #19
    10
    #20
    5

    Who else ChatGPT recommends

    Sites that come up for the same prompts as Ams.org, ranked by how many topics they share.

    cambridge.org
    88 shared
    springer.com
    85 shared
    wiley.com
    82 shared
    amazon.com
    79 shared
    projecteuclid.org
    76 shared
    bookshop.org
    75 shared
    books.google.com
    61 shared
    goodreads.com
    60 shared
    crcpress.com
    57 shared
    barnesandnoble.com
    57 shared
    maa.org
    53 shared
    pearson.com
    49 shared
    mit.edu
    48 shared
    worldcat.org
    46 shared
    oup.com
    45 shared
    archive.org
    40 shared
    google.com
    35 shared
    elsevier.com
    32 shared
    harvard.edu
    27 shared
    How is this estimated?

    ChatGPT doesn't publish prompt data. We measure real demand for each commercial topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers), and run each topic through ChatGPT 5 times to record which sites it recommends and in what order. A click-through-by-rank curve splits each topic's demand across the recommended sites. Every figure is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →