A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | wargamer.com | 5/5 | 753 | $158 |
| 2 | boardgamegeek.com | 5/5 | 452 | $94 |
| 3 | theminiaturespage.com | 4/5 | 301 | $63 |
| 4 | games-workshop.com | 4/5 | 207 | $43 |
| 5 | wargamevault.com | 3/5 | 151 | $31 |
| 6 | miniaturemarket.com | 2/5 | 113 | $23 |
| 7 | avalonhill.com | 2/5 | 83 | $17 |
| 8 | flamesofwar.com | 3/5 | 64 | $13 |
| 9 | consimworld.com | 2/5 | 49 | $10 |
| 10 | gmtgames.com | 2/5 | 38 | $7 |
| 11 | matrixgames.com | 3/5 | 30 | $6 |
| 12 | privateerpress.com | 2/5 | 23 | $4 |
| 13 | slitherine.com | 2/5 | 19 | $3 |
| 14 | strategyandtacticsmagazine.com | 2/5 | 15 | $3 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →