A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | spreeder.com | 5/5 | 185 | $40 |
| 2 | readsy.co | 5/5 | 111 | $24 |
| 3 | irisreading.com | 5/5 | 74 | $16 |
| 4 | accelareader.com | 4/5 | 51 | $11 |
| 5 | speedreading.com | 4/5 | 37 | $8 |
| 6 | spreederapp.com | 3/5 | 28 | $6 |
| 7 | readingsoft.com | 3/5 | 20 | $4 |
| 8 | spritz.com | 2/5 | 16 | $3 |
| 9 | readspeeder.com | 2/5 | 12 | $2 |
| 10 | spreeder.net | 3/5 | 9 | $2 |
| 11 | 7speedreading.com | 2/5 | 7 | $1 |
| 12 | amazon.com | 2/5 | 6 | $1 |
| 14 | spritzinc.com | 2/5 | 4 | $0 |
| 15 | readwise.io | 2/5 | 3 | $0 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →