A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | mendeley.com | 5/5 | 30 | $21 |
| 2 | zotero.org | 5/5 | 18 | $13 |
| 3 | overleaf.com | 5/5 | 12 | $8 |
| 4 | endnote.com | 5/5 | 8 | $5 |
| 5 | scopus.com | 3/5 | 6 | $4 |
| 6 | researchgate.net | 5/5 | 5 | $3 |
| 7 | academia.edu | 4/5 | 3 | $2 |
| 8 | refworks.com | 3/5 | 3 | $1 |
| 9 | connectedpapers.com | 3/5 | 2 | $1 |
| 10 | scholar.google.com | 2/5 | 2 | $1 |
| 11 | webofscience.com | 2/5 | 1 | $0 |
| 12 | crossref.org | 5/5 | 1 | $0 |
| 13 | springer.com | 3/5 | 1 | $0 |
| 14 | elsevier.com | 3/5 | 1 | $0 |
| 15 | arxiv.org | 4/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 16 | papersapp.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 17 | readcube.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 18 | wiley.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 19 | scite.ai | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 20 | grammarly.com | 4/5 | 0 | $0 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →