A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | polaris.com | 5/5 | 413 | $173 |
| 2 | ski-doo.com | 5/5 | 248 | $103 |
| 3 | arcticcat.com | 5/5 | 165 | $69 |
| 4 | yamaha-motor.com | 4/5 | 113 | $47 |
| 5 | snowmobile.com | 5/5 | 83 | $34 |
| 6 | snowest.com | 4/5 | 62 | $25 |
| 7 | supertraxmag.com | 4/5 | 45 | $19 |
| 8 | sleddermag.com | 4/5 | 35 | $14 |
| 9 | snowmobilefanatics.com | 4/5 | 27 | $11 |
| 10 | trailtech.net | 3/5 | 21 | $8 |
| 11 | lynxsnowmobiles.com | 2/5 | 17 | $6 |
| 12 | timbersled.com | 3/5 | 12 | $5 |
| 13 | snowgoer.com | 3/5 | 10 | $4 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →