A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ridgid.com | 5/5 | 151 | $81 |
| 2 | roebic.com | 4/5 | 91 | $49 |
| 3 | greenpig.com | 3/5 | 61 | $32 |
| 4 | zep.com | 3/5 | 42 | $22 |
| 5 | ridex.com | 3/5 | 30 | $16 |
| 6 | bio-clean.com | 3/5 | 23 | $12 |
| 7 | septicmaxx.com | 2/5 | 17 | $8 |
| 8 | amazon.com | 3/5 | 13 | $6 |
| 9 | rootx.com | 3/5 | 10 | $5 |
| 10 | lowes.com | 2/5 | 8 | $4 |
| 11 | walmart.com | 2/5 | 6 | $3 |
| 12 | acehardware.com | 2/5 | 5 | $2 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →