A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | avvo.com | 5/5 | 30 | $678 |
| 2 | justia.com | 5/5 | 18 | $406 |
| 3 | martindale.com | 5/5 | 12 | $271 |
| 4 | findlaw.com | 5/5 | 8 | $186 |
| 5 | lawrank.com | 4/5 | 6 | $135 |
| 6 | rankings.io | 5/5 | 5 | $101 |
| 7 | thriveagency.com | 3/5 | 3 | $74 |
| 8 | thomsonreuters.com | 3/5 | 3 | $57 |
| 9 | clio.com | 4/5 | 2 | $44 |
| 10 | scorpion.co | 4/5 | 2 | $33 |
| 11 | ahrefs.com | 2/5 | 1 | $27 |
| 12 | searchengineland.com | 2/5 | 1 | $20 |
| 13 | moz.com | 2/5 | 1 | $16 |
| 14 | semrush.com | 2/5 | 1 | $13 |
| 15 | lawyerist.com | 3/5 | 0 | $10 |
| 16 | victorious.com | 2/5 | 0 | $8 |
| 17 | jurisdigital.com | 3/5 | 0 | $6 |
| 18 | good2bsocial.com | 2/5 | 0 | $5 |
| 19 | legalmarketing.com | 2/5 | 0 | $4 |
| 20 | paperstreet.com | 2/5 | 0 | $3 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →