A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | referee.com brand | 4/5 | 1 | $0 |
| 2 | refcom.com | 3/5 | 1 | $0 |
| 3 | assignr.com | 4/5 | 1 | $0 |
| 4 | refassist.com | 4/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 5 | sportsengine.com | 4/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 6 | refcoms.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 7 | arbiter.net | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 8 | refcom.net | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 9 | usasoftball.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 10 | arbitersports.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 11 | fifa.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 12 | hudl.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 13 | officially.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 14 | worldrugby.org | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
| 15 | refsupport.com | 2/5 | 0 | $0 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →