A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | avvo.com | 5/5 | 101 | $625 |
| 2 | justia.com | 5/5 | 61 | $375 |
| 3 | findlaw.com | 5/5 | 41 | $250 |
| 4 | martindale.com | 5/5 | 28 | $172 |
| 5 | nolo.com | 5/5 | 20 | $125 |
| 6 | lawyers.com | 5/5 | 15 | $93 |
| 7 | superlawyers.com | 5/5 | 11 | $68 |
| 8 | hg.org | 5/5 | 9 | $53 |
| 9 | legalmatch.com | 5/5 | 7 | $40 |
| 10 | injuryclaimcoach.com | 3/5 | 5 | $31 |
| 11 | alllaw.com | 3/5 | 4 | $25 |
| 12 | lawinfo.com | 3/5 | 3 | $18 |
| 13 | rocketlawyer.com | 2/5 | 3 | $15 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →