A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | labware.com | 5/5 | 185 | $318 |
| 2 | labvantage.com | 5/5 | 111 | $190 |
| 3 | thermofisher.com | 5/5 | 74 | $127 |
| 4 | autoscribeinformatics.com | 5/5 | 51 | $87 |
| 5 | genologics.com | 5/5 | 37 | $63 |
| 6 | cloudlims.com | 5/5 | 28 | $47 |
| 7 | waters.com | 3/5 | 20 | $35 |
| 8 | starlims.com | 3/5 | 16 | $27 |
| 9 | labworks.com | 3/5 | 12 | $20 |
| 10 | labguru.com | 4/5 | 9 | $15 |
| 11 | starlims.net | 2/5 | 7 | $12 |
| 12 | agilent.com | 4/5 | 6 | $9 |
| 13 | sap.com | 3/5 | 5 | $7 |
| 14 | lockpath.com | 2/5 | 4 | $6 |
| 15 | benchling.com | 3/5 | 3 | $4 |
| 16 | labcollector.com | 2/5 | 2 | $3 |
| 17 | limsforum.com | 2/5 | 2 | $3 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →