A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | fabric.com | 5/5 | 2.1K | $288 |
| 2 | joann.com | 4/5 | 1.2K | $172 |
| 3 | michaels.com | 4/5 | 823 | $115 |
| 4 | fabriclondon.com | 3/5 | 566 | $79 |
| 5 | fabriclink.com | 3/5 | 412 | $57 |
| 7 | fabricut.com | 3/5 | 226 | $31 |
| 8 | fabricgroup.com | 2/5 | 175 | $24 |
| 9 | fabricmart.com | 2/5 | 134 | $18 |
| 10 | fabricwarehouse.com | 2/5 | 103 | $14 |
| 11 | fabricland.com | 2/5 | 82 | $11 |
| 12 | fabricdepot.com | 2/5 | 62 | $8 |
| 13 | amazon.com | 2/5 | 51 | $7 |
| 14 | etsy.com | 2/5 | 41 | $5 |
| 15 | hobbylobby.com | 3/5 | 31 | $4 |
| 16 | fabrics-store.com | 2/5 | 26 | $3 |
| 17 | fabric.com.au | 2/5 | 21 | $2 |
| 18 | calicocorners.com | 2/5 | 15 | $2 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →