New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Prompt category

What's the best employment discrimination lawyer?

A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.

Est. people asking / mo
7.6K
CPC
$1.94
Total est. value / mo
$849
Common ways people ask this (15)
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for workplace harassment?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for wrongful termination?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for wage discrimination?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for pregnancy discrimination?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for age discrimination?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for disability discrimination?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for racial discrimination?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for gender discrimination?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for religious discrimination?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for retaliation claims?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for hostile work environment cases?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for executive-level employees?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for union workers?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for federal employees?
  • Can you recommend the best employment discrimination lawyer for remote workers?

What ChatGPT actually answered

One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.

Websites ChatGPT recommends for this prompt

Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.

RankWebsiteAppearsEst. visits / moEst. value / mo
1 findlaw.com 5/5 151 $293
2 nolo.com 5/5 91 $176
3 justia.com 5/5 61 $117
4 avvo.com 5/5 42 $80
5 lawyers.com brand 5/5 30 $58
6 martindale.com 4/5 23 $44
7 eeoc.gov 5/5 17 $32
8 legalmatch.com 5/5 13 $24
9 hg.org 4/5 10 $19
10 superlawyers.com 3/5 8 $14
11 shouselaw.com 2/5 6 $11
12 employmentlawhandbook.com 2/5 5 $8
13 workplacefairness.org 3/5 4 $7
14 littler.com 3/5 3 $5
15 discriminationlawyers.com 2/5 2 $4
16 ogletree.com 2/5 2 $3
17 fisherphillips.com 2/5 2 $2
18 employmentlawgroup.com 2/5 1 $2
How is this estimated?

ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →