New: ChatGPT now sends real traffic to the websites it recommends. See why it matters →
Home › Prompt category

Which discrimination attorney is best?

A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.

Est. people asking / mo
2.8K
CPC
$1.68
Total est. value / mo
$279
Common ways people ask this (20)
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for workplace discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for housing discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for age discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for race discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for sex discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for disability discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for pregnancy discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for religious discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for LGBTQ discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for hiring discrimination?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for wrongful termination cases?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for retaliation claims?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for hostile work environment cases?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for federal discrimination cases?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for state discrimination cases?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for employee-side representation?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for employer-side defense?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for low-cost consultations?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for high-stakes litigation?
  • Which discrimination attorney is best for class action discrimination cases?

What ChatGPT actually answered

One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.

Websites ChatGPT recommends for this prompt

Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.

RankWebsiteAppearsEst. visits / moEst. value / mo
1 avvo.com 5/5 56 $93
2 justia.com 5/5 33 $55
3 findlaw.com 5/5 22 $37
4 nolo.com 5/5 15 $25
5 lawyers.com 5/5 11 $18
6 martindale.com 5/5 8 $13
7 legalmatch.com 5/5 6 $10
8 attorney.com brand 5/5 5 $7
9 hg.org 5/5 4 $6
10 superlawyers.com 4/5 3 $4
11 shouselaw.com 4/5 2 $3
12 eeoc.gov 5/5 2 $2
13 lawinfo.com 2/5 1 $2
14 employmentlawfirms.com 2/5 1 $1
15 law.cornell.edu 2/5 1 $1
16 dol.gov 2/5 1 $1
17 aclu.org 2/5 1 $0
How is this estimated?

ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →