A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | chatpdf.com | 5/5 | 2.1K | $102 |
| 2 | pdf.ai brand | 5/5 | 1.2K | $61 |
| 3 | askyourpdf.com | 5/5 | 823 | $41 |
| 4 | smallpdf.com | 5/5 | 566 | $28 |
| 5 | humata.ai | 5/5 | 412 | $20 |
| 6 | lightpdf.com | 5/5 | 309 | $15 |
| 7 | ilovepdf.com | 4/5 | 226 | $11 |
| 8 | pdfgear.com | 5/5 | 175 | $8 |
| 9 | chatdoc.com | 4/5 | 134 | $6 |
| 10 | monica.im | 3/5 | 103 | $5 |
| 11 | adobe.com | 2/5 | 82 | $4 |
| 12 | tenorshare.com | 2/5 | 62 | $3 |
| 13 | docsbot.ai | 2/5 | 51 | $2 |
| 14 | updf.com | 2/5 | 41 | $2 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →