A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cam.com | 5/5 | 3.1K | $671 |
| 2 | cam4.com | 4/5 | 1.8K | $402 |
| 3 | cambridge.org | 3/5 | 1.2K | $268 |
| 4 | cams.com | 3/5 | 839 | $184 |
| 5 | cam.ac.uk | 3/5 | 610 | $134 |
| 6 | camfrog.com | 3/5 | 458 | $100 |
| 7 | cambridgeenglish.org | 2/5 | 336 | $73 |
| 8 | cambridgeaudio.com | 3/5 | 259 | $57 |
| 9 | camden.gov.uk | 3/5 | 198 | $43 |
| 10 | cam.net | 2/5 | 153 | $33 |
| 11 | cam.org | 2/5 | 122 | $26 |
| 12 | cammodels.com | 2/5 | 92 | $20 |
| 13 | cambridgeconsultants.com | 2/5 | 76 | $16 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →