A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | interbrand.com | 5/5 | 68 | $58 |
| 2 | pentagram.com | 5/5 | 41 | $35 |
| 3 | landor.com | 5/5 | 27 | $23 |
| 4 | futurebrand.com | 5/5 | 19 | $16 |
| 5 | wolffolins.com | 3/5 | 14 | $11 |
| 6 | 99designs.com | 2/5 | 10 | $8 |
| 7 | fcb.com | 3/5 | 7 | $6 |
| 8 | collins.com | 2/5 | 6 | $5 |
| 9 | koto.studio | 3/5 | 4 | $3 |
| 10 | catchwordbranding.com | 3/5 | 3 | $2 |
| 11 | siegelgale.com | 2/5 | 3 | $2 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →