A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bouncehouse.com | 5/5 | 275 | $244 |
| 2 | partycity.com | 4/5 | 165 | $146 |
| 3 | inflatableoffice.com | 4/5 | 110 | $97 |
| 4 | orientaltrading.com | 2/5 | 76 | $67 |
| 5 | jumpbunch.com | 2/5 | 55 | $48 |
| 6 | bigbouncefun.com | 4/5 | 41 | $36 |
| 7 | funfactorypartyrentals.com | 2/5 | 30 | $26 |
| 8 | moonwalkrental.com | 3/5 | 23 | $20 |
| 9 | azbouncepro.com | 2/5 | 18 | $15 |
| 10 | partypleasers.com | 2/5 | 14 | $12 |
| 11 | bounceabout.com | 2/5 | 11 | $9 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →