A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | artsy.net | 5/5 | 753 | $188 |
| 2 | artforum.com | 4/5 | 452 | $112 |
| 3 | google.com | 5/5 | 301 | $75 |
| 4 | moma.org | 5/5 | 207 | $51 |
| 6 | gagosian.com | 5/5 | 113 | $28 |
| 7 | tate.org.uk | 5/5 | 83 | $20 |
| 8 | sothebys.com | 4/5 | 64 | $15 |
| 9 | pacegallery.com | 5/5 | 49 | $12 |
| 10 | christies.com | 4/5 | 38 | $9 |
| 11 | whitecube.com | 5/5 | 30 | $7 |
| 12 | metmuseum.org | 4/5 | 23 | $5 |
| 13 | nationalgallery.org.uk | 4/5 | 19 | $4 |
| 14 | saatchiart.com | 3/5 | 15 | $3 |
| 15 | artnet.com | 3/5 | 11 | $2 |
| 16 | hauserwirth.com | 4/5 | 9 | $2 |
| 17 | davidzwirner.com | 2/5 | 8 | $1 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →