A commercial recommendation prompt. We size how many people ask ChatGPT this from real search demand, then run it through ChatGPT to see which websites it recommends.
One of the 5 times we asked ChatGPT this, verbatim. The leaderboard below aggregates all 5 runs.
Aggregated across 5 runs (min 2/5 appearances). Estimated visits split the prompt's demand by rank. Sites matching the prompt's own brand are marked branded and excluded from the leaderboard.
| Rank | Website | Appears | Est. visits / mo | Est. value / mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | copyleaks.com | 5/5 | 28K | $1.4K |
| 2 | gptzero.me | 5/5 | 17K | $832 |
| 3 | quillbot.com | 5/5 | 11K | $555 |
| 4 | originality.ai | 5/5 | 7.6K | $381 |
| 5 | turnitin.com | 5/5 | 5.6K | $277 |
| 6 | writer.com | 5/5 | 4.2K | $208 |
| 7 | zerogpt.com | 5/5 | 3.1K | $152 |
| 8 | sapling.ai | 5/5 | 2.4K | $117 |
| 9 | contentatscale.ai | 5/5 | 1.8K | $90 |
| 10 | crossplag.com | 5/5 | 1.4K | $69 |
| 11 | undetectable.ai | 5/5 | 1.1K | $55 |
| 12 | openai.com | 5/5 | 833 | $41 |
| 13 | hivemoderation.com | 3/5 | 694 | $34 |
| 14 | grammarly.com | 4/5 | 555 | $27 |
| 15 | scispace.com | 3/5 | 416 | $20 |
| 16 | detecting-ai.com | 3/5 | 347 | $17 |
| 17 | smodin.io | 2/5 | 278 | $13 |
| 18 | brandwell.ai | 2/5 | 208 | $10 |
| 19 | plagiarismdetector.net | 2/5 | 167 | $8 |
| 20 | scribbr.com | 2/5 | 139 | $6 |
ChatGPT doesn't publish prompts, so we don't show logged conversations. We measure real demand for this topic from Google search volume, scale it to ChatGPT's user base (on average about 1 ChatGPT user for every 8 Google searchers, a ratio that varies by topic), and run the prompt through ChatGPT 5 times to record which websites it recommends and in what order. Estimated visits split that demand across the recommended sites by a click-through-by-rank curve. Every number is a modeled estimate, not measured analytics. Full methodology →